• EBS plus: S3 storage is more expensive. (0.15 $/Gb > 0.1$/Gb)

• S3 plus: Serving static files from EBS may influence my web server's performance negatively. Is this true? Does serving images affect a server performance notably? For S3, my server will not be responsible for serving static files.

• S3 plus: Serving static files from EBS may result in I/O cost, though it will probably be minor.

• EBS plus: People say EBS is faster.

• S3 plus: People say S3 is safer for persistence.

• EBS plus: There is no need to learn an API: it is straightforward to save the images to an EBS volume.

EBS：S3存儲更昂貴。（0.15美元/ GB > 0.1美元/ GB）
S3 +：從EBS服務(wù)靜態(tài)文件可能會負(fù)面影響我的Web服務(wù)器的性能。這是真的嗎？服務(wù)圖像會顯著影響服務(wù)器性能嗎？對于S3，我的服務(wù)器不負(fù)責(zé)運(yùn)行靜態(tài)文件。
S3+：從EBS服務(wù)靜態(tài)文件可能導(dǎo)致I/O成本，雖然它可能是次要的。
EBS：人們說EBS更快。
S3 Plus：人們說S3對于持久性更安全。
EBS Plus：沒有必要學(xué)習(xí)API：將圖像保存到EBS卷中是很簡單的

總結(jié)

以上是生活随笔為你收集整理的AWS Elastic Block Store和Simple Storage Services区别的全部內(nèi)容，希望文章能夠幫你解決所遇到的問題。

如果覺得生活随笔網(wǎng)站內(nèi)容還不錯，歡迎將生活随笔推薦給好友。